Scott Adams vs Twitter

“if Twitter is suppressing my political speech, I consider it moral treason against the people of the United States even if it is allowed under their terms of service, and even though it is technically legal. I hope I’m wrong, and that my problems are simply technical in nature. Because if Twitter is doing what people say they are doing, and suppressing certain types of speech, the company needs to die for the good of the Republic.

And I trust that it will.”

-Scott Adams

#WikiLeaks precommitment verification hash

From

Auda ibu Tayi

on mpcdot.com

 

Wikileaks hash-browns while they’re hot:

pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

pre-commitment 2: Ecuador eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72

pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74

These are for document verification. They can be used to prove prior knowledge of the contents of files.

Given a particular file, you can get a “digest” of that file by running a cryptographic “digester” like this:

Type this at a terminal:

openssl dgst -sha256 what_actually_happened_to_vince_foster.txt

See this as a result:

SHA256(what_actually_happened_to_vince_foster.txt)= c5a10ecdbdae4ade3559fae06b6ee42642de2b9bc32703fb5a7e0039f25f338b

(The entirety of the example file above is the string “I killed him.” followed by a single newline.)

Only someone with knowledge of the exact (bit-for-bit) contents of the file could produce that particular digest.

The goals of publishing the digest may include (but are not limited to):

* Proving to someone *else* who has the file that you have the file as well, without revealing the file’s contents (this can be used as a credible threat of disclosure)

* Proving to the world (perhaps posthumously or otherwise unable to communicate) that you had the file at a certain date, without revealing the file’s contents (this is what “pre-commitment” above means)

In all likelihood this means that something has spooked Assange.

Nothing may come of this. If this is an “or else”, the other party may back down and the files would remain a shared secret.

The situation is likely fluid.

2016 really is something else folks.

FBI leak on Reddit – 100% right so far

redditfbi

Donald J Trump statement on the latest fake scandal by the lapdog media for hillary

Donald J. Trump statement for those who don’t or won’t farcecuck:

“I’ve never said I’m a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that I’m not. I’ve said and done things I regret, and the words released today on this more than a decade-old video are one of them. Anyone who knows me, know these words don’t reflect who I am.

I said it, it was wrong, and I apologize.

I’ve travelled the country talking about change for America. But my travels have also changed me. I’ve spent time with grieving mothers who’ve lost their children, laid off workers whose jobs have gone to other countries, and people from all walks of life who just want a better future. I have gotten to know the great people of our country, and I’ve been humbled by the faith they’ve placed in me. I pledge to be a better man tomorrow, and will never, ever let you down.

Let’s be honest. We’re living in the real world. This is nothing more than a distraction from the important issues we are facing today. We are losing our jobs, we are less safe than we were 8 years ago and Washington is broken.
Hillary Clinton, and her kind, have run our country into the ground.

I’ve said some foolish things, but there is a big difference between words and actions. Bill Clinton has actually abused women and Hillary has bullied, attacked, shamed and intimidated his victims. We will discuss this more in the coming days.

See you at the debate on Sunday.”