DISC, Bigfoot and Angel Hair

Gabe Valdez established beyond any question, any question, that “Dulce Base” horseshit was NSA, AFOSI, AEC and other agencies (NASA, SAP black budget private companies) using unknown but human “UFO” vehicles as their standard travel means, providing transportation for several extremely secret operations: “cattle mutilations” (atomic test monitoring, bioweapon research), “bigfoot” (unknown intelligent race being spied on and interacted with by special forces killers, secret diplomats) and “skinwalkers” (genies / jinn, bioweapon research).

Common features of the secret human cabal who carry out specific and meaningful operations are invisibility created by technology, UFO type vehicles with all too human lawn mower quiet engines, helicopters rigged up to fake UFOs, men in black, ie AFOSI hoaxers, and a concerted effort to deceive and disinform normal people who cross the path of their own operations – or the path of unknown entities who are intelligent non- homo sapiens species – more than one – reptilians, bigfoot, sea devils and others.

It’s a secret world, where the human agents use disguises, secret technology which helps make it all mysterious, secret spacecraft and aircraft and stage magician tricks. This same secret world is maintained so that the human operatives can go about their business unimpeded as they monitor and research phenomena. Men dress up as aliens or monsters while they seriously and with great intensity investigate REAL aliens and monsters.

There are some monumentally stupid people making a living by pimping gibberish to the gullible, and these self helpers add to the confusion which is the objective of the camouflage and conceal operatives. Under this con game and intel operation is a set of real phenomena. The real phenomena include:

X: a Martian civilization with surviving Martians as well as knowledge of the Martian origins of “humanity” – alien hybridized modern humans who supplanted the furry shaggy original human races – ogres, trolls, kobolds and elves.

Y: an Antarctic civilization with surviving coneheads as well as knowledge of the Antarctic race’s secret control of human cultures.

Bigfoot: surviving prehistoric races. Not all of them are “primitive”; not all of them are peaceful or friendly; they include the race of People Herders, ie meat eaters who once mass farmed “humans” as slaves and food.


The creation by the CIA and NSA on behalf of DISC of “ufology” replaced the pre existing Forteana researcher community. By creating categories they also created automatic category errors and prevented the growth of the original honest and open minded SKEPTICAL Fortean researchers who DID NOT put things into arbitrary categories such as “Bigfoot”, “Faeries”, “UFOs”, “space aliens”, “supernaturals”, “spirits”, “ghosts” and so on.

With closed categories of science, magic, faith and other fictional sorting patterns it prevents scientific inquiry using the scientific method – BY THE PUBLIC. Meanwhile in private and in secret DISC and others are researching in the same way that Newton or Tesla did- with no arbitrary limits and no fictional categories.

The only real clues we have to what is conducted in secret comes from two processes: Fences and Opposites.

Despite all the Poe type stuff – “the best place to hide something important is in plain sight” – no emphasis on something important, leave it lying around – the most secret most intense solution stuff is not left lying around. It is fenced off. Area 51, Area 52 (the Utah alien biology labs), other places so secret it is death to persist in discussing them: Naylor Place for example. Try researching that one, The Village of the Prisoner, if you’ve grown weary of life. This is the principle of FENCES.

The other clue comes from OPPOSITES. To see what is closest to the truth, simply look at what the lapdog media, the government and other control systems tells you is absurd and unthinkable. For example Roswell: BOTH sides of the “truth” were provided by military intelligence: weather balloon AND crashed alien spaceship were provided by intel and BOTH are therefore automatically false. The truth is too dangerous and secret to be released. And the truth is NOT either the second level disinformation promulgated by lie pimps: the truth is NOT about progerie victims being used as test subjects on balloon suspended nazi flying wings. That is all true but it is not the Truth you are seeking. Look at the OPPOSITES.

What is Opposite? The Opposite is that which is forbidden, either forbidden by being ridiculed or forbidden by being buried by a lie.

Lies like aliens from Zeta Reticuli. Lies like Bigfoot being a primitive homind or a gorilla relative. Lies like no water on Mars or the Moon, no blue skies on Mars, no life on the Moon.

What is the ultimate absurdity in the field of UFOs? Answer that and you have found the Truth.

What is the ultimate absurdity in the field of Earth science? What do you “know” about the planets? What do you “know” about space travel? Who is telling you these things? And what are their qualifications- and motivations?

Have you ever heard of Townsend-Brown? He invented a “UFO” drive that worked.

Then by sheer coincidence he founded a major UFO civilian research group.

And no one ever makes the connection.

Why did a wave of military intelligence deception agents create a wave of civilian UFO groups?

Anyone who talks about Zeta Reticuli is either a fool, conman or a liar.

Anyone who dismisses life on Mars is a fool, conman or a liar.




NASA calls off next Mars mission

Blue skies on Mars. That’s a new one. -Total Recall, 1986

Follow The Money

NASA's InSight Mars lander spacecraft in a Lockheed Martin clean room near Denver. As part of a series of deployment tests, the spacecraft was commanded to deploy its solar arrays in the clean room to test and verify the exact process that it will use on the surface of Mars. NASA’s InSight Mars lander spacecraft in a Lockheed Martin clean room near Denver.


NASA is calling off its next mission to Mars because there isn’t enough time to fix a leaky seal on a key science instrument.

The InSight spacecraft was set for launch in March.

The problem is in a seal around the lander’s seismometer, which was designed to measure ground movement on the red planet.

NASA managers and French designers of the instrument said on Tuesday they must now decide whether the leak in the vacuum-sealed connector needs to be repaired, redesigned or the mission scrapped.

The next opportunity to launch the InSight lander is in May 2018 since the best chances of launching missions between Earth and Mars occur for just a few weeks every 26 months.

“We’re close enough to launch but, unfortunately, we don’t have enough time to try to identify the leak, fix…

View original post 187 more words

Blue Skies on Mars

The Color of Mars

The Color of Mars

My science fiction RPG “Red Drums” was about a hollow Phobos containing apparent “tombs” of three-eyed titanic Martians who, when disturbed, proved to be merely sleeping… It also featured a Mars with a blue sky, something unheard of in science fiction since the late 1950s… For whatever reason…


The Color of Mars

author: Holger Isenberg, web@mars-news.de
, http://mars news.de

back to mainpage
deutscher Text
created: March 1999
last update: 14.June 2000

The Red Planet, this name has to appear in every article of the main-stream press on Mars. The same importance play the little green men in contributions of renowned daily German papers such as Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung or Sueddeutsche Zeitung published on the Mars meteorite ALH84001.
Without doubt, the planet appears red with the naked eye in the night sky, whereby our earth viewed from Mars, would appear clearly blue, due to the 70% water coverage in connection with refraction of light in the atmosphere. With a reverse relation of the water land distribution however, rather a brown-green planet would be to be seen from space.
The color of the atmosphere, caused by Rayleigh Scattering[4] at gas molecules, determines thus only in very small amount the color of a planet as seen from space and also directly on the surface!
Why then should the Mars sky, as NASA/JPL PR-department spreads it, should appear red? This coloring is justified if at all, only with the refraction of light at atmospheric dust. But such masses of dust in the atmosphere do not prevail over years on a planet, which has large water-clouds, fog and ground frost, since water would wash these away after short time.
Astronomers at the Hubble Spacetelescope and amateur-astronomers[8] are observing, since long time now, white water-clouds and blueish atmosphere.

Pic. A, Viking 1, Nr. 12b069, 29. August 1976, 12.65 locale Mars time
This picture was created with color-correction derived from the filter response data. (click on picture to view it in original size)
All Viking and Pathfinder images courtesy of JPL/NASA/Caltech.

original data without correction

Indeed, when the first color picture from Viking 1 was received on Earth, the Mars soil was red-brown and the sky was blue, a landscape comparable with the desert of Arizona[3] (fig. A and B).
These are original pictures[5] of the two probes, which are only slightly color corrected to match the filter response values of the camera system. However, the original data without correction, you see on the right of each image, has almost no detectable difference in color.
The Viking cameras operated according to the principle of a color scanner, whereby for different light wave lengths different sensors with separate data channels are used.
To create a colorful picture from this scanner data, a color calibration table is necessary. These tables can be seen near the mast of the parabolic antenna in Pic. A and B and show among grayscales the three basic colours (RGB) of a color monitor.
Already with the naked eye it can be detected there that the colours are correctly shown. Also in Pic.E this can be acknowledged, since the white ground frost (water ice!) supplies a natural color calibration to the white alignment.

Pic. B, Viking 2, Nr. 22a158, 25. September 1976, 11.96 locale Mars time
This picture was created with color-correction derived from the filter response data.

original data without correction

Pic.C shows a typical (NASA-)red Mars picture in the color, taken 18 months later. How does it come to this color change, although the sharply bordered shadows and the otherwise clear colours suggest no atmosphere dust?
The solution of the mystery appears, when using an image processing program: By rising the color-values of blue and green about 50% and 25% one gets to Pic.D, which shows the well known true coloring from Pic.A and B.

Pic. C, Viking 1, 12h016,
11 February 1978, 15.56

Pic. D
Blue amplified by 50%, green around 25%

Pic. E, Viking 2, 21i093,
18.May 1979, 14.24

With the same method[1] we can get true color picture from Mars Pathfinder (Pic. F and G). Note, the sharpness of the Pathfinder images is by far not that good as 20 years ago on Viking as during the Pathfinder mission an information-reducing picture compression algorithm (comparable to JPEG) was used.

Pic. F, Pathfinder,
August1997, source:[6]

Pic. G,
Blue amplified by approx. 50%,
green by approx. 25%

Pic. H, 12e018
03.Jul 1977, 15:20

Pic. I, 12b166
6.Oct 1976, 7:48
Temporary, the surface illumination is really red, caused by dust-storms, darkening the sky. The image on the left was taken shortly after or during such a storm and the diffuse light with almost no shadows is visible. In contrast to this, the image on the right, shows sharp shadows and clear blue sky, the normal condition on Mars.
On the image-data of the Viking- and Pathfinder-Missions, this diffuse illumination is a very rare condition and not the normal state, as NASA seems to publish it with their dull-red pictures.
(click on images for unfiltered original data)

And now the “official” true color view of the Pathfinder landing site published by NASA:

Pic. J, Source:
Original Caption Released with Image:
The true color of Mars based upon three filters with the sky set to a luminance of 60. The color of the Pathfinder landing site is yellowish brown with only subtle variations. These colors are identical to the measured colors of the Viking landing sites reported by Huck et al. [1977]. This image was taken near local noon on Sol 10. A description of the techniques used to generate this color image from IMP data can be found in Maki et al., 1999. Note: a calibrated output device is required accurately reproduce the correct colors.

I don’t know why you should calibrate your output device to view this funny bad-colored picture.



Holger Isenberg, Blue Sky on Mars: http://mars news.de/life
Robert Shepherd, Synthetic High resolution Viking image: http://www.marscentral.com/Places/Landings/Viking/2/
Vincent DiPietro, Mars: Red sky or blue sky?: http://www.mufor.org/dipietro3.html, http://rense.com/general9/color.htm
Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, Why is the sky blue?: http://meto.umd.edu/~ezra/why.html other sources: Blue Sky and Red Sky explained, “What atmosphere would produce a red sky?”
NASA/JPL, Planetary Data System Imaging Node: http://www pdsimage.jpl.nasa.gov/PDS /
Peter Smith, University of Arizona, Pathfinder panorama: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/ops/fpress img.html
Filter spectral responsivities on Viking Lander: http://mars-news.de/color/filter.html
Association of Lunar & Planetary Observers: Mars Section: http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rhill/alpo/mars.html

Never A Straight Answer – more old lies about Mars disproven

Do we finally have proof of life on Mars? Unexplained methane spikes suggest bacteria is living on the red planet

  • Nasa scientists in California have revealed evidence for life on Mars
  • They say methane spikes on the planet could be produced by bacteria
  • And, at the moment, there is no better explanation for the spikes
  • The signs were spotted briefly occurring by one of Curiosity’s instruments 
  • Life is the chief producer of methane on Earth, although there are many non-biological processes that can also generate the gas
  • But no such process could be ruled out during tests – suggesting there may be bacteria living on or under the surface of Mars