even in the West there are thriving pockets of third-World indolence and corruption. I think none more obvious than those employed within the media disinformation complex. It is not their uniform liberalism that necessarily earns this occupation such broad public contempt. But rather their pristine absence of professionalism.
That being called “racist” is considerably more damaging to one’s career than being called unprofessional is one of the more luminous signs of our societal decay. One of these terms being the province of emoting juveniles, while the other represents a pillar of civilization. The Western culture of professionalism is much of why you are reading this in a warm home with electricity, rather than loping after a gazelle across the Serengeti with your bare scrotum swaying to an adder’s gaze. It was the professional discipline of routinely outnumbered soldiers that held the ground we now drape in red carpets. The professionalism of scientists, engineers, architects, and physicians who eschewed pleasant sloth for the grinding labor that gave us the infrastructure and appurtenances we diligently take for granted. One could cripple many keyboards in banging about the importance of ambient professionalism to the civic hygiene of western society, particularly compared…
View original post 547 more words
“if Twitter is suppressing my political speech, I consider it moral treason against the people of the United States even if it is allowed under their terms of service, and even though it is technically legal. I hope I’m wrong, and that my problems are simply technical in nature. Because if Twitter is doing what people say they are doing, and suppressing certain types of speech, the company needs to die for the good of the Republic.
And I trust that it will.”
Those who have stolen into power and benefitted from the calamitous fall in education and the influx of third world savages to further dilute the traditions of culture, civilisation and law which once bound us together have used as their chief weapon false forced dichotomies. The illusion of a choice between two alternatives when both alternatives are in fact simply different manipulated paths to the same crooked rigged game outcome.
Mao Tse Turnbull, an avowed socialist and typical collectivist feudal minded banker, is simply one half of the one party state “choice”.
That his smarmy, snide and weak character was not up to the task set him by his paymasters is not very relevant. It is not relevant because the overall objective, the destruction of the anglo-saxon culture and legal system in Australia, is continuing regardless of which red-blue puppet is prime minister.
It’s gratifying to see especially odious members of the political-media-bureaucrat class annihilated, but this satisfaction must never blind people to the “business as usual during alterations” going on in the background.
Machiavelli said that when institutions are changed or destroyed, a sensible plotter will keep the outer form and the name of what is being wrecked the same, even as its composition and functions are altered and subverted.
Thus America still has a “Supreme Court” even though it has long since ceased to function as it was intended to originally.
Thus there is a “liberal party” in Australia even though it is a now a socialist construct with no principles at all, let alone conservative ones.
Every day Turnbull remains in parliament, let alone as the nominal leader of the “liberals” is an indictment on every genuine liberal and conservative who still claims membership in that organisation.
Sic semper tyrannis.